21 January 2016 – Last year Exterro launched a new e-discovery resource called the Basics of E-Discovery guide.
It is a brilliant guide. We have worked with it and it is a an easy to read, approachable, and informative resource for anyone interested in mastering e-discovery fundamentals. And given over the past couple of years we’ve seen a strong trend of companies bringing more of the E-Discovery process in house this has naturally increased the number of people looking to become familiar with the basic concepts, tasks and activities associated with the various stages of the process.
The goal of the guide is very apparent: it’s intentionally designed … Read the rest
14 January 2015 – Yep, it seems it is the first question college students as each other:“What’s your major?” Perhaps the most superfluous. Spend a little time getting to know them, and you’ll be able to make an educated guess.
And that’s the implication of a newly published paper, which reviews 12 studies to determine if the folk wisdom that students with specific personality traits tend to major in certain subjects is actually true.
Its conclusion – based on the answers of 13,389 students – is … yes.
Psychologist Anna Vedel
of Aarlus University in Denmark reports finding “consistent ‘big five’ personality group differences across … Read the rest
30 November 2015 – For some years now pundits have been writing about the “deprofessionalization of the legal profession”, a malaise which, it is claimed, has infected the profession to the extent that “the noble profession” is losing its soul. As if the legal industry was ever more than a business. People, please. Re-read your Cicero, Charles Dickens, Sinclair Lewis, Chris Hedges. Rubbing on a false sheen of “profession” don’t make it so. Something about lipstick on a pig.
In the corporate law venue … the most mature and highly competitive marketplace for legal services … corporate lawyers are merely functionaries subservient to the dictates of their corporate … Read the rest
2 September 2015 – Over the weekend we published a notice about the Department of Labor’s proposed a new rule regarding overtime and the opportunity to make comments. We noted that United Contract Attorneys is submitting a comment to the rule proposing a carve-out for document review attorneys to the FLSA exemption to mandated overtime pay for professional workers, including lawyers.
Previously we have been reporting on the recent decision of Lola v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (decided on July 23rd) containing prima facie statements that the work of document review performed was not the practice of … Read the rest
29 August 2015 – The Department of Labor (DOL) has proposed a new rule regarding the overtime exemptions in the Fair Labor Standards Act (click here to view the proposed rule).
United Contract Attorneys is working to make sure the DOL knows about contract attorney working conditions and wages, and is asking you to submit a COMMENT, by September 4, 2015.
They have suggested the following:
2. You can write your own comment or you can copy and paste the following sample which they have drafted:
a. It’s time to update the overtime
… Read the rest
23 July 2015 – A lawsuit demanding overtime pay from legal heavyweight Skadden, Arps can proceed, an appeals court ruled today, potentially clearing the way for temporary lawyers hired to do routine document review to earn extra wages. The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling came in a two-year-old lawsuit brought against Skadden and legal staffing agency Tower Legal Solutions by an attorney who claims he deserves overtime for a $25-an-hour assignment reviewing documents on a Skadden case.
Under federal labor laws, licensed lawyers don’t automatically earn overtime pay for work in excess of 40 hours a week if what they are doing is … Read the rest
From Doug Austin at eDiscovery Daily:
June 3, 2015 – Remember when we asked the question whether a blended document review rate of $466 per hour is excessive? Many of you weighed in on that one and that post is still our most viewed of all time. Marking up the billing rate for reviewers over 500 percent may or may not also be unacceptable, depending on who you talk to. But, everyone agrees that billing more hours than you actually worked is a bad thing.
According to a new article by Gina Passarella in The Legal Intelligencer (Are Contract Attorney Markups Of Any Concern to … Read the rest
1 June 2015 – Last week the U.S. Second Circuit heard the Lola vs. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom case which is testing whether some purportedly professional work might in fact be eligible for overtime. The case pits Skadden against a contract attorney hired by a legal staffing agency to review documents for $25 an hour on a Skadden case.
A district court judge dismissed the case in September, ruling that the work Lola did qualified as practicing law under North Carolina guidelines. “As junior associates at law firms well know,” U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan in New York wrote in the decision, tasks like confirming citations and … Read the rest
Angela Gambetta, Managing Director/The Posse List
9 May 2015 – About a decade ago, American consumers seemed the most debt-addicted people on the planet. Then … bingo … around 2008 something rather remarkable began to occur: the level of consumer card and mortgage debt in the US began shrinking.
But there is one glaring exception to this trend: student debt. Over the past decade, the level of outstanding student debt has almost tripled to $1.3 trillion.
Although the law makes it relatively hard to walk away from student debt, defaults are also strikingly high. There are many ways to measure this figure but the Department of Education reports that … Read the rest
13 March 2015 – Deloitte and a document review company it acquired a year ago are alleged to have saved millions of dollars by treating hundreds of document reviewers as contractors when they were, in reality, employees based in their offices.
Deloitte acquired ATD Legal Services in January 2014. Representative plaintiff Shireen Sondhi, a lawyer based in Toronto, claims that she and hundreds of fellow document reviewers were mis-categorised as independent workers – with the result that the businesses saved large sums in payroll deductions and in not having to offer labour protections, holidays and overtime.
Supervised in Deloitte offices
Counsel for the plaintiff, Andrew Monkhouse, said in a … Read the rest